If you’ve ever applied for a patent, you know that there often is a substantial amount of time between when you apply and when you receive an answer. This often is due to the amount of time an examiner needs to review your patent application.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is aware of the frustration caused by wait times, and they are currently reexamining examination time goals. In fact, the USPTO is seeking public feedback regarding this issue over the next couple months.
According to the Federal Register Notice, the USPTO “plans to use the public feedback as an input to help ensure that the Office’s examination time goals accurately reflect the amount of time needed by examiners to conduct quality examination in a manner that responds to stakeholders’ interests.”
The USPTO has compiled the list of questions below for stakeholders regarding the patent examination process. Respondents can address as many of the questions as they wish, or provide other related feedback.
- Do you perceive a difference in the quality of examination performed in complex technologies compared to less complex technologies? If yes, which do you perceive as higher quality and why? In what aspect(s) is the quality of examination higher
- What factors do you consider when estimating the amount of time needed to take various steps in prosecution, such as preparing responses to Office actions or preparing for interviews? In particular, if you prosecute applications in a variety of technology areas, how do those factors vary among the technologies
- Are the applications you prosecute more or less complex than in the past, e.g.,10 years ago? What factors contribute to the increase or decrease in complexity? Do you believe the increase or decrease in complexity has affected the amount of time it takes to prosecute the applications? If so, by how much? Do you believe the increase or decrease in complexity has affected the quality of examination? If so, how?
- In order to increase the quality of examination, do you believe that an increase in the time allotted for examination should be designated for specific activities, such as interviews, or left to the discretion of the examiner? What activities would you prioritize and allocate more time to?
- Are there any portions of Office actions which you feel do not add value or quality to the examination? If yes, what are they?
- What other activities beyond examining, such as research or training, could examiners spend time on that would add value? Why do you believe these activities could add value?
- While the focus of this request for comments and the roundtables is to find the appropriate amount of time for examination, cost and pendency are also contributing factors. Do these factors raise a concern that should be considered?
Written comments are requested by December 27, 2016 and can be sent via email to [email protected]. All comments will become public record and be placed on the USPTO’s website.